Home Editorial

Art and violence

It is a welcome development that dead bodies, especially horribly defaced victims of violence, have slowly but surely disappeared from the front pages of local dailies. Once upon a time, it was almost the thumb rule for the media here to grade newsworthiness of pictures by the gore and violence depicted. Crime reporting then was almost literally the reporter’s own blow by blow account of post mortem analysis of dead bodies, giving graphic details of how bullets hit the left chin to exit at the base of the right ear etc. Pictures of the victim would also often be printed alongside showing how accurate these descriptions were, as if to tell the readers more emphatically that pictures do not lie. Perhaps it is also a question of the “shock and awe” value of these pictures depleting because of over use. Why would not it be too, daily carnage having become the state’s staple? Once upon a time, somebody getting killed even by falling off the balcony or meeting with a scooter accident was shocking news to be related in horror over and over for weeks. These were the good old 1970s when unnatural deaths were rare. But today, memories of those days seem like a myth. Violent deaths have ceased to be tragedies that they are in actuality. Instead they have relegated to the status of just another routine fact of life.

But on a more optimistic side, it could also very well be a matter of a conscious re-sensitisation process happening in the media and amongst the larger public as such. The latter, if it is true, is important, for this would then be the beginning of, or at least another important contribution to the campaign to de-legitimise violence. Violence in many ways is a state of mind. Even the ordinary and the least violent, are voyeuristically attracted to violence and violent deaths. Notice the number people who would rush to see the spot where a suicide hanging has taken place. Crowds at such sites would almost invariably include children, housewives, elders etc. They would then talk about how horrifying the sight was, deriving perverse pleasure out of it even if it is accompanied by a shiver running down their spine. It is this same basic impulse in everybody that once shaped the kind of journalism that relishes blood and gore on the front page. Fighting violence at its very basic, in this sense has to begin with an acknowledgement of the necessity to control this impulse. Denunciation of violence has to begin from the individuals and in private homes.

There is yet another danger in the representation of violence in art and literature. While actual experience of violence is fearsome and traumatic, in art and literature, especially in insensitive hands, it can become static, communicating static emotions and not the actual sensations and the traumas that accompany them so that representation of violence often acquires a peculiar and perverse aesthetics of its own. This perhaps explains why violence on screen is so addictive and has such a large audience. Even cartoon movies and computer games these days contain so much violence, so much so that it is doubtful if today’s children are able to get the real horrifying import of violence and its implications. Parents of school children will know better, but it would not be unreasonable to suspect children today see violence just as they are represented on the computer screen and consider them as just another thrilling activity like hotly contested sporting activities. There is something very wrong in all this and the fight against violence must also include putting violence and its representation in art and literature in the perspective it is meant to be. To put it another way, it cannot be a comfortable experience for anybody to witness an injection performed, not to talk about an actual surgical operation on a human. When the doctor pierces the patient’s skin with the needle of the syringe, it would make any normal person cringe. Likewise, to watch somebody biting his or her nail and tear away flesh and skin, as is the repulsive habit of so many, is very discomforting. If he were to take out a razor and begin slashing his own wrist, it would make so many scream with horror even though the injury caused is not to the witness. But this sense of discomfort at witnessing a violent act is often not there in art or media representation of blood and gore. This is why we are encouraged by the waning space for blood and gore on the front pages of our media.

Source: Imphal Free Press



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version